This is my blog! I'll give some updates on my projects as well as just talk about a bunch of stuff I like or think is interesting.
Yeah, I missed out on many Wednesdays. I definitely remembered the existence of this series, but I either didn't have enough to turn into a post or just forgot to write one in time. So this time, I'm finally going to write one in advance so that I can end this segment. That doesn't mean I won't share cool stuff I find online in the future, but there won't be reoccuring posts for that. Just a shoutout every now and then is good enough. That being said, here's the last series of links for Web Wednesday:
This morning, I saw a video recommended to me called a genuinely unhinged SunnyV2 video. I'm not a "fan" of nor am I subscribed to SunnyV2, and never watched his videos by themselves. Rather, I have previously watched reaction content from creators like Cr1TiKaL (who again, I am not subscribed to) in my stupors of laziness and while looking for a video to put on while eating. And the important thing that I need to admit is that I took SunnyV2 at complete face value, not realizing all of his many flaws in his videos. I think this is partly due to how creators like Cr1TiKaL praise SunnyV2, which helps bolster the reputation of this unfamiliar channel to me, not wanting to do my own research and investigate whether that reputation is deserved.
Back to the video I mentioned: SunnyV2's original video about famous Twitch streamer Ninja is without a doubt one of the most incoherent I have seen from a (currently) popular YouTuber. I worry that I may not have come to the conclusion if someone else was reacting and commentating over the original video, so I think making this post can help clear up my mind. Looking at his channel, SunnyV2 is a very people-oriented person. He commentates almost exclusively on social media personalities and, in particular, the many ways in which they failed or became hated or irrelevant.
Little Joel's video I mentioned earlier as well as his briefer commentary called How SunnyV2 invents a moral highlight that SunnyV2 has a tendency to make strange connections between facts to "reveal" why social media stars fall from fame. For Kwebbelkop, it's because he bragged about his wealth. For Ninja, it's because he got "political" and was a hypocrite for being mean in the past. For SunnyV2, it seems that if something that he doesn't like occurs at the same time of a creator's fall, then he has enough reason to present that something as a cause of failure.
This doesn't cover all of his content, however. There are times when SunnyV2 creates a video to merely present certain facts or recount a series of events surrounding a creator. Take How Primitive Building Videos Are Staged and How JellyBean Became YouTube's Most Hated Creator for examples. These videos do not have any specific morals that SunnyV2 is interested in presenting, rather facts and events presented in an (hopefully) engaging manner. I'd go so far as to call both of them competently made, and I have no big issues with them.
However, this type of video is presented with the same weight and style that SunnyV2 uses for his more opinionated content, creating a blend and mix of facts and false morals. Now, subjectivity is implied by any essay, but I have an issue with the channel's tendency to present clear opinions like "you should be apolitical if you are popular" as facts or valid reasoning. SunnyV2's tone and editing style reinforce that he is trying to present many ideas as formal and well-thought-out, and therefore more trustworthy. The tone is (mostly) monotone, so it seems less biased because he's not emotional. This is probably conflation with the idea that emotional people tend to be more biased, however the inverse is not equivalent in truth (not being emotional does not imply you are unbiased). In addition, his clean editing style is a notable improvement over the days of audio recordings over CS:GO surf footage, but it fails to supplement an appropriate amount of substance, ultimately coming off as vapid and, at worst, deceptive.
And that's how a lot of his channel comes across as - vapid and deceptive. It is concerned with presenting many topics of petty Internet drama like factual, documentary-style overviews that we can trust to be reputable because of our false assumptions that the commentator is unbiased or that the editing style is connected with suitably good content. The most irritating part about realizing this is knowing that many people are singing the praises of not only SunnyV2, but many other commentary channels that take this approach. And not every video that these channels produce could be bad! But I fear that they may be using the same tricks as SunnyV2 to subtly influence their audience to agree with their reasoning. If there's one thing people should take away from this, it's to question the content they consume and use their own reasoning skills to see whether they agree or disagree with the points that are being presented to them.
Ultimately, I think commentary is a perfectly valid genre of video when done right. You can even make points that aren't unreasonable! Drew Gooden is pretty good at this, for example. He also made a commentary video about Ninja, called I took Ninja's Masterclass and it ruined my life. His points about Ninja's Masterclass are presented in conjuction with good examples and don't make any big leaps of logic. The scope of the video is much narrower than SunnyV2's video, and yet (or perhaps because of that) it contains much more substance. It's also important that Drew is a much simpler commentator, with basic edits and writing. He explains things in a down-to-earth level that people can casually understand, and because of that he doesn't have to make false connections or add extra editing flair. And if you want a more serious essay style that's closer to SunnyV2's structure, you can look at his video Ellen's Fall from Grace. Again, the video is simple but it works as a strength to make it more digestable.
It almost feels like some channels believe that the problem with commentary from the past (think 2016 era of white young adults saying "cringe") was that it was too simple, or too small in scope. And while I commend YouTubers for doing the brave and honorable thing of not bullying children, increasing the production value and editing quality won't transform bad reasoning into anything else.
More than a month ago now, there was new functionality added for "Twitter Blue" subscribers to increase the character count of their tweets to from 280 to 4,000. There are some pros and cons to this change:
Pros:
Cons:
And if you've spent enough time on Twitter (which is too much time), then those points were already obvious to you. But there is one more objection against increasing character count - something that makes me sound insane when trying to describe it. I argue that there's a certain kind of joy, an art, to cramming all of your characters into that small limit.
I was made aware of this art when viewing many of Internet Comment Etiquette's videos. For those unaware, he teaches his "students" how to leave proper comments on internet posts and videos (which may sometimes be not so proper). And for almost of all the tweets he makes in his videos, he will perfectly max out his character count. For me, at least, there was something satisfying about seeing him leave inappropriate comments in such a precise manner.
Trying to do this on your own can be a bit daunting at first. If you've made tweets on Twitter, then yes, you are aware that there is a limit, but it's never required that you tweet at exactly that limit. So while we're used to saying short things, we were never trained as humans to ration out our characters in writing. Word counts for essays exist, but they're usually a little imprecise, giving you a length of range of word lengths between 100 and 200 words. It would be ridiculous to expect people to write exactly 1000 words, obviously.
But if you so choose, you can partake in this challenge of "fitting it in". I'm calling it an "artificial puzzle", because it sounds cool and I don't think anybody important has used that phrase before. My definition of an artificial puzzle is some sort of self-imposed puzzle on a pre-existing task - basically, a challenge that doesn't really exist. There's no reward for maxing out your character count, and you won't really get any recognition for it. But there is a win condition to this artificial puzzle, and there are certain ways you could strategize and approach the problem to get to that condition. In game design, this is typically referred to as an "intristic reward", which is a reward that the player themselves achieves outside of the scope of the game's direct objectives. For example, a player could speedrun a game or break out of the game's map as fun challenges for themselves.
The actual art of maxing the word count is imprecise, as you will learn. Start by drafting your initial tweet, and drag it out a bit so that your thought or opinion or commentary gets close to the limit. If you're passionate enough about a topic, you should be able to generate enough thoughts about it that can fill the tweet. If you're under the limit, consider changing your vocabulary a bit to add a few extra characters here and there. If you didn't have punctuation before, try adding some to wherever it's appropriate and see where that takes you. If you're over the limit, try simplifying some words or abbreviating where possible. If you did have punctuation, maybe try removing it (unless it ruins the structure of the tweet).
As with many skills (useful or not), this becomes easier with more practice. I should also note that this entire artificial puzzle may not apply to you if you don't use Twitter in the same way that I do. I like to comment on a few trendy things here and there, but a lot of my actual tweets consist of silly one-off jokes and incoherent nonsense. So if you're focused on providing, say, education (in which case, Twitter is a bad place for you), then the artificial puzzle is probably not worth it for you. But if you want to squeeze out the entertainment value of writing silly words together on the platform, try giving it a shot.
After a certain point, like at 4,000, trying to cram all of your characters to the limit is too tiring and excessive. So while it may promote bad takes, misinformation, unproductive insults, toxic discourse, and more, I do appreciate the 280-limit for artificially creating a micro-literary-challenge for those bored enough to undertake it.
Edit on Mar 16, 2023: Son of a bitch I forgot to post this to this page yesterday. I'm so mad right now.
Oh shit.
Well, unfortunately, I ended up being busy for basically every single Wednesday in a row in this semester, so I only feel like I'm able to make a new post now on spring break. You could say that I could've just made a post on an off day and then uploaded that post on Wednesday, but that would require any amount of forward thinking. But, being honest, there wouldn't have been enough content for me to talk about every two weeks much less every single week.
If I keep this series going for the future, I think focusing on getting the most quality rather than quantity will help make it sustainable. But for now:
Turns out when you spend less time on the Internet, you find less cool stuff on it. I'll try to up my attentiveness for next (?) month so that I can show off some more obscure things that people would like.
Read here: The Ackscha Project
I originally had the idea for this story in the middle of last summer. After a little over 10,000 words of concepts and planning, it has officially started with a set of 3 chapters, and will gain more chapters on a (hopefully) regular basis.
There are a myriad of reasons why I wanted to write this story - self-actualization, improving my skills as a writer, fulfilling childhood dreams, proving my ability to commit to projects, etc. I can't promise that the story will be good, as it will focus on a lot of topics I've had on my mind. There will be elements inspired from childhood shows and books as well as parts from mature shows that I've seen in the past year. It'll be a bit goofy, it'll get political, and it'll probably feel a bit personal at times. The story will definitely get messy, but I want it to be true to the ideas I want to present.
My main goal is this: complete this story and include all of my ideas. If I can accomplish that, I will be more than satisfied.
Very few people are reading this in the first place, but if you are, thank you, and if you do really want to read my story, then thank you thank you thank you. I will at least make the story readable for you.
It returns, despite all odds. It turns out the internet is a vast space filled to the brim with interesting things, so I've made it my New Year's resolution to find every single interesting thing on the internet. After which, I will promptly stop using the internet and live in the woods as a local folktale villain. For now, though, here's some neat stuff from the Web:
Well, I'm glad that this post has a better variety than last time, and that it features some smaller projects that people wouldn't have seen through the YouTube algorithm. In the future, I'd like to keep these posts closer to this level of variety and obscurity. That definitely means this won't ever be a weekly segment, although perhaps it could be biweekly? Monthly? Or just whenever I feel like making one of these, we'll see by the time this returns.
Happy New Year! The clock striking midnight didn't feel as impactful as previous years, but I'm still excited for this year's possibilities. Now, I don't talk about video games a lot despite it being my main source of entertainment, but I think it's fun to discuss them from time to time. So for today's post, I'd like to give a brief retrospective of my 2022 experience with video games.
For the past few years, I've been using the tier list system to rank all of the games I played each year. It's simpler and more fun than a boring top 10 list, in my opinion. One word of warning, however: the only modern console I have is a Nintendo Switch, and my PC is a pre-built Dell office computer from years ago. What I'm saying is that I do not play a lot of the mainstream titles each year, and I don't play many games in their year of release. Regardless, I'm continuing the tradition from previous years:
Some highlights and commentary of the above games:
Almost half of the games I played in 2022 actually came out in 2022, which is pretty surprising! However, I also played half as many games as I did in 2021, probably due to some much longer games like P5R, Pokemon Legends: Arceus, The Great Ace Attorney Chronicles, etc. I'm hoping to clear at least some games from my backlog this year, but I'll definitely be occupied playing some long games again, especially the new Zelda (when I disappear off the face of the earth starting from May 12th, 2023, you'll know why).
After creating this website, setting up the basics, then leaving for 3 months, then coming back and working on it, I can proudly present that this website is officially OPEN! (but not finished)
Every page aside from Other and Writing have been set up and given some words for people to read if they so choose. Writing will open up soon when I'm ready, but otherwise I'm glad that this website actually exists now. Is it necessary for me? Not at all! But I like writing, and archiving my written thoughts seemed like fun. I'll try to make updating this website a weekly activity, whether it be for simple blogs or full on project updates. If you came here from me bugging you about it, thanks! Feel free to read as much or as little as you want! Just HAVE FUN!!!
What's that? I have a blog section here? I suppose I should use it for something...How about I just spam a bunch of random links?
I got inspiration for this segment/post from Tom Scott's weekly newsletter, wherein Tom shares some cool articles, websites, videos, etc. from around the net and describes them a bit. Ever since it started, I've been jealous of how he gets to share random shit he found online so cleanly whereas I just have to keep spamming YouTube videos into my friends' DM's! That ends today, so from now on the only link I'll send to my friends 100 times in a row is this blog. For this first (and maybe only) installment of Web Wednesday, have some videos:
Wow! So many links! If I do Web Wednesday again, I definitely want to include a bigger variety of content rather than just "here's some YouTube videos I thought were cool", but otherwise, a raging success!